Open Conversation

A week or so ago, I ran across one of my posts on a discussion forum. It had been copied and reposted in its entirety, along with my name and a link to the original post. The discussion was quite interesting, though sometimes critical of what I had written, and I thought that I would add my own comments in order to address some of the questions that had been posed. Unfortunately, the discussion group was closed to visitors, and I was informed, when I tried to join it, that it was not accepting new members. I can hardly overstate my frustration.

It was not that the group had chosen to pursue the discussion on their own site rather than mine. I know that many online writers consider this to be bad etiquette, but I think that there are perfectly valid reasons to begin a new discussion elsewhere rather than to pursue it entirely through a single source site. I myself have used my site to discuss other writing on the web, and I would say that this practise can only encourage the kind of open dissemination that is the greatest advantage of internet media.

Neither was it that the forum had copied my post in full that made me frustrated, because this also accords with what I believe the practise of the internet should be. I have not yet officially released the material on my site through a Creative Commons license, but this is entirely due to my own laziness. As long as my writing is attributed properly and is not being used to make a profit, I have no reservations at all about how people copy, share, and mix it. I firmly believe that this kind of openness is essential to promoting cultural creativity, whether through the internet or anywhere else.

No, what frustrated me was that the discussion was closed, that the conversation was posted publicly but restricted to its private members. To me, this kind of closedness is an affront to the nature of the internet. It takes a medium whose strength is in its capacity for openness and sharing, for dialogue and interaction, and makes it into the same kind of closed dialogue that could exist through any other medium.

I admit that there may be perfectly good reasons to keep a conversation private. I would even say that a good deal of what is posted publicly on the internet should probably remain private. However, to post publicly a closed conversation eliminates the very openness that make the internet function most effectively. It closes rather than opens dialogue. It arrests rather than mobilizes thinking. It paralyses rather than stimulates writing. It fails to encourage what I find most valuable in the internet: the open conversation.

Advertisements
7 comments
  1. TC said:

    I kind of understand why you might not post a link
    though I’m also curious.
    And also wonder, how did you ‘come across’ your post?

  2. Dave,

    I recognize the irony in not posting a link when I am writing about maintaining an open conversation, and I considered for some time about whether or not to include one. In the end, I decided thst I wanted to keep my comments from causing personal offence, so I proceeded as I have.

    TC,

    I discovered the forum through the dashboard of my blog, which lets me know when people have linked to my site. If the forum had not done me the courtesy of linking to the original post, I would probably never have known that it even existed.

  3. Curtis said:

    I am more impressed by the fact that you are upset about the overall application of the internet in this case rather than your ban on being able to provide clarity on your own piece of material. Impressed on the level that this internet misapplication would not at all be what pissed me off.

  4. Curtis,

    For me, the greatest loss in every case is the loss of relation, even if only in potential. It matters to me very little if someone disparages or misunderstands what I write. It matters to me very much if someone closes the avenues to turn even this disagreement and misunderstanding into the opportunity for encounter.

  5. Dave,

    Thanks for the link. It articulates well my motivations for writing. I am not so interested in how many people read what I write. I am very interested that certain people read that I write. I write for a community, not for the internet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: